I-15 "Chato"

Spanish Air Force Fighter-Biplane

ICM | Nr. 72061 | 1:72

Fakta

Merke:: ICM
Tittel:: I-15 "Chato" Spanish Air Force Fighter-Biplane
Nummer:: 72061
Skala:: 1:72
Type:: Byggesett
Utgitt:: 2005 New tool
Strekkode:: 4823044401598 (EAN)
Emballasje:: Brettet eske (Sideåpning)
Tema:: Polikarpov I-15 » Propell (Fly)

Markeringer

Polikarpov I-15

Polikarpov I-15 Chato

Ejército del Aire (Spanish Air Force 1939-now)

8-21
Juli 1941 - Sabadell
Field Green, Flat Light Blue, Aluminium, Flat White, Sand
32 Fighter Reg. 32-2
1944 - San Javier
Field Green, Flt Light Blue, Aluminium, Flat White

Fuerzas Aéreas de la República Española (Spanish Republican Air Force 1936-1939)

CC-011 (Teniente Romulo Negrin Mijailov)
Juli 1938 (Result: 1)
Flat Black, Field Green, Flat Light Blue, Aluminium, Insignia Re
Sqn. 3a CA-151
1938 - Barcelona
Field Green, Flat Light Blue, Aluminium, Insignia Red

Eskens innhold

Støpebrett (Light gray), Støpebrett (Clear), Dekalark (vannoverførings) (Multi-colored)

Dimensjoner:
261x190x41 mm (10.3x7.5x1.6 inch)

Hva er i boksen »

Produktets tidslinje

ICM

2005

2006

2009

2012

201x

2021

2022

Rebox

Ny boks

All historikk »

Bruksanvisning

Last ned 1379Kb (.pdf)

Markedsplass

No partner shops available

In-box anmeldelser

Eksterne anmeldelser

Annonse

Innholdsanmeldelse

IPMS Deutschland

Innholdsanmeldelse

Modellversium

Magasiner

Sky Model | 22

Italian (TOC: 7 lines)

April-May 2005

Kommentarer

Vladimir Kafka
The timeline above is wrong. This is NOT a "new decals" rebox of I-15bis :-o. It's not even just a "new parts" rebox, it's a different kit of a different airplane (see wings, cowling, windshield, cockpit seat etc. etc.). Even common parts on both airplanes are tooled rather differently.
It's a separate line, heavily based on Pavla kit (obviously same master, interchangeable parts). ICM has more detailed cockpit and cockpit doors cut out. Later reboxed as early I-15 here:
scalemates.com/kits/140997-icm-72062-i-15
The ICM I-15bis is a separate family (or actually two of them, old and new).
I already spent time to correct the whole timeline once, only to have most of the changes overriden by someone, so I write it here instead.

14 January 2016, 12:05