Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)
2 in 1 w/ interior
REVOSYS | No. RS-3001 | 1:35
![Boxart Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) RS-3001 REVOSYS Boxart Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) RS-3001 REVOSYS](/products/img/4/9/4/963494-16882-82-720.jpg)
Gerçekler
- Marka:
- REVOSYS
- Başlık:
- Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
- Numara:
- RS-3001
- ölçek:
- 1:35
- tip:
- Tam kiti
- Yayınlandı:
- 2017 Yeni araç
- Barkod:
- 4897083250011 (EAN)
- konu:
- VK 3601 » Tanklar (Araçlar)
Kutu içeriği
Plastik ladin, Fotoetrik perde, Decalsheet (su kaydırağı)
boyutlar:
380x240x90 mm
(15x9.4x3.5 inch)
Ağırlık:
890 g (1.96 lbs)
Ürün zaman çizelgesi
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
Talimatlar
İndir 12024Kb (.pdf)
Pazaryeri
No partner shops available
Kutu içi incelemeler
Dış incelemeler
reklâm
Tüm incelemeler » (10 toplamda)
Dergiler
tüm dergiler » (4 toplamda)
Yorumlar
![](/profiles/img/43402-702-s.jpg)
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
1 6 October 2018, 06:34
![](/profiles/img/user-s.jpg)
Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.
6 April 2024, 22:28
![](/profiles/img/user-s.jpg)
Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.
7 April 2024, 14:15
![](/profiles/img/user-s.jpg)
Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.
10 April 2024, 21:15
![](/profiles/img/user-s.jpg)
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April 2024, 02:11