Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)

2 in 1 w/ interior

REVOSYS | Нет. RS-3001 | 1:35

Факты

Фирма:

REVOSYS

Заголовок:

Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior

Число:

RS-3001

Масштаб:

1:35

Тип:

Полный набор

Вышел:

2017 Новая разработка

Штрих-код:

4897083250011 (EAN)

Тема:

VK 3601 » Танки (Транспортные средства)

Содержимое коробки

Пластиковый литник, Фототравление, Декаль (водная)

Хронология продукта

 

REVOSYS

Rye Field Model

2017

 

2019

Новая разработкаНовые деталиНовые детали

Инструкции

Скачать 12024Kb (.pdf)

Магазин

No partner shops available

Oбзор содержимого коробки

Внешние обзоры

Реклама

Обзор в коробке

Panzer Modell

Обзор в коробке

Armorama

Обзор в коробке

Armorama

Обзор в коробке

Missing-Lynx

Все отзывы » (10 в целом)

Журналы

Tamiya Model Magazine | 261

English (TOC: 11 lines)

July 2017

Model Military International | 138

English (TOC: 14 lines)

October 2017

Scale Military Modeller | Vol 48 Issue 566

English (TOC: 11 lines)

May 2018

Все журналы » (4 в целом)

Комментарии

DONALD STEVENS
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?

1 6 October 2018, 06:34

beers
Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.

 6 April 2024, 22:28

beers
Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.

 7 April 2024, 14:15

beers
Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.

 10 April 2024, 21:15

beers
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.

 11 April 2024, 02:11