North American P-51D Mustang

Revell | No. H-619:50 | 1:72

Facts

Brand:: Revell
Title:: North American P-51D Mustang
Number:: H-619:50
Scale:: 1:72
Type:: Full kit
Released:: 1963 New box
Packaging:: Rigid box (Top opener)
Topic:: North American P-51 Mustang » Propeller (Aircraft)

Markings

North American P-51 Mustang

North American P-51D-15NA Mustang

US Army Air Forces (1941-1947)

343 FS, 55 FG, 8 AF CY-G | 44-15701 The Millie P (Maj. Edward B. Giller)
January 1945 Original (Incorrect) Colour Scheme - RAF Wormingford, Essex
FS11136 FS17178 FS13591 FS14255
343 FS, 55 FG, 8 AF CY-G | 44-15701 The Millie G (Maj. Edward B. Giller)
January 1945 World War 2»European Theatre - RAF Wormingford, Essex
FS34079 FS17178 FS27038 FS11136 FS13591 FS14110

Box contents

Plastic sprue, Decalsheet (waterslide)

Boxart designed by Brian Knight

Product timeline

Revell

Revell (Great Britain)

Revell/Kikoler

Revell Japan

Revell/Lodela

Revell/ceji

HobbyBoss

Alanger

Doyusha

Squadron Products

1963

1966

1967

1969

196x

1974

1975

1976

1978

197x

1980

1981

1984

1994

1998

1999

199x

2006

2008

200x

2010

2012

2013

2017

2019

New tool

New box

Marketplace

No partner shops available

In-box reviews

External reviews

We don't know about any in-box reviews for this North American P-51D Mustang (#H-619:50) from Revell.

Comments

Stilicho
Aren't there duplicate entries here?

All comments (9) » 18 June 2015, 09:40

Stilicho
hat's what I said. "So they are " different . I was not being sarcastic. I didn't think I was imprecise. It was just a superficial observation in passing. All is well. Peace ,brother.

18 June 2015, 21:32

Rex
Sorry, "so they are" could mean that you are agreeing with Gunther, or it could mean that you were repeating your original post. (you only thought the word "different", you didn't type it)

I figured that you were still on the path of combining kits when they shouldn't be,,,,,you have to admit that is where you have been for a while now on here.

But, yes, add that word "different" in there, and you are 100% correct.

(Rex, the stupid "Moh-reen" that can only read what is typed)

18 June 2015, 22:00