Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)

2 in 1 w/ interior

REVOSYS | No. RS-3001 | 1:35

Okosságok

Márka:

REVOSYS

Cím:

Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior

Szám:

RS-3001

Méretarány:

1:35

Típus:

Teljes készlet

Megjelent:

2017 Új eszköz

Vonalkód:

4897083250011 (EAN)

Téma:

VK 3601 » Tankok (Járművek)

A doboz tartalma

Műanyag rugó, Photoetched fret, Matrica (nedves)

Termék idővonal

 

REVOSYS

Rye Field Model

2017

 

2019

Új eszközÚj alkatrészekÚj alkatrészek

Útmutató

Letöltés 12024Kb (.pdf)

Piactér

No partner shops available

In-box értékelés

Külső vélemények

Hirdetés

Dobozon belüli áttekintés

Panzer Modell

Dobozon belüli áttekintés

Armorama

Dobozon belüli áttekintés

Armorama

Dobozon belüli áttekintés

Missing-Lynx

Minden értékelés » (10 összesen)

Magazinok

Tamiya Model Magazine | 261

English (TOC: 11 lines)

July 2017

Model Military International | 138

English (TOC: 14 lines)

October 2017

Scale Military Modeller | Vol 48 Issue 566

English (TOC: 11 lines)

May 2018

Összes magazin » (4 összesen)

Hozzászólások

DONALD STEVENS
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?

1 6 October 2018, 06:34

beers
Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.

 6 April 2024, 22:28

beers
Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.

 7 April 2024, 14:15

beers
Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.

 10 April 2024, 21:15

beers
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.

 11 April 2024, 02:11