Stephen G Oh wow! This is a great addition. Such an interesting aircraft! Potentially nice oil-canning in the fuselage too, it seems.
6 1 January, 21:02
Doug Eby 1/35, 1/32, I really don't care. I'm not planning any dioramas, I just want a well-engineered, detailed model kit without any major flaws. The biggest downside I see is that accessories like decals can't be used between the scales, but that's not enough to keep me from buying one. I'm in.
3 February, 22:18
David Winter Uuugggg.... so they have a Lancaster at 1:32, but then go and release this in 1:35. Yes I know the difference is minuscule and 99% of people won't notice, but still. The bomber series has been established at 1:32, just stick to it.
Jeff C. Those old Monogram kits are great to build for nostalgic reasons but are very basic and inaccurate. They are basically, along with Tamiya, why I started building armor.
15 August, 23:50
Ben M Same. I recently picked up a mostly complete m3 Lee, which was the first non-snaptite armor kit I built.
Grant Hills I thought about the dio idea, but then couldn’t think of a time when armor would be near aircraft. I can’t recall a picture of armor in close proximity to aircraft, except, perhaps passing a crashed airframe. So not sure it matters. Please link a pic if you have any.
Ben M Well shoot. It looks like it was deleted. It was a photo of Pakistani M60 tanks leaving Mogadishu airport in Somalia, complete with wrecked Somali MiG-21's.